The first of many..

A classfellow from university got married recently. The first one from our group actually. She was slated to be second, but the first one had her engagement broken.. so there.

The ceremony was…… okay. It was a segregated event *shudder* which meant that since you have no idea who the brides’ family is, you dont know many people. Period. Plus, there were only us three male friends were there, the rest of the group consists of girls (about 8 of them). We usually all hang out together, but this wasn’t so possible here. Result… boredom! I was in and out of the wedding in under 40 minutes!

Whats funny is…. i spent 45 minutes ironing the kurta i was gonna wear that night :P

Here’s wishing you a very happily married life T!!

17 Responses to “The first of many..”

  1. on 16 Jan 2007 at 3:03 pm herbwoman

    Ha Ha Ha~!
    Segregated weddings are common in my family and I actually think it is better - think of all the married men who get free rides and think of lil bachas with waging harmones tsk tsk

  2. on 16 Jan 2007 at 6:10 pm TDH

    Well, I bet the women missed a hot guy in kurta :D

  3. on 16 Jan 2007 at 7:49 pm icedmocha

    ahahhaa! yuppp..und weddings dont do! soo u cudnt eye up the candy eh..wot a shame. come 2 london nd hav a look around u..segregated shaadiz evrywher. is quite refreshin 2 go 2 the khi ones heheh. nd noo i dont chek out the opposite sex..u no i get just as easily bored!

    so wot number r u on the shaadi hit-list?? hahaha

  4. on 16 Jan 2007 at 7:50 pm icedmocha

    ooo typo in 1st line..tis ment 2 be ‘ u nd weddings don’t do’

  5. on 16 Jan 2007 at 10:19 pm mansoor

    hw: poor u :p no candy :p

    iced: u have no idea!! weddings suck unless they’re a big affair with the whole family involved :p then its fun :-D

  6. on 17 Jan 2007 at 12:18 pm UTP

    WEDDINGS ARE BO-OO-OOOO-OORING!!! Segregated or otherwise….

  7. on 17 Jan 2007 at 1:55 pm mansoor

    utp: after ur own, i guess ur no longer interested in eye candy :p

  8. on 17 Jan 2007 at 2:43 pm *Untamed Desires*

    hehehe good comments u’v got here :D i prefer segregated weddings though……….SO much more easier, somehow. just dont ask me y, cos i wudnt know the reason either :P

  9. on 17 Jan 2007 at 2:56 pm mansoor

    ud: u do? hhmm.. guess atleast then u can eat in peace ;) haha. Waise.. unattached girls have more or less the same problem in segregated weddings as in combined ones :p the ever-present aunties checking them out lolzz :D

    atleast guys dont do that :p we’re busy making business contacts :D

  10. on 18 Jan 2007 at 10:40 am Herbwoman

    segregated Weddings are better - firstly its not like we can actually play a battle of eyes with the entire family hovering over the head and secondly there are no eye candies only ugly married men sigh

  11. on 18 Jan 2007 at 3:47 pm mansoor

    aah HW.. when there’s a will, there will be a way (for eye battles ;))

  12. on 18 Jan 2007 at 5:25 pm PsycheD

    hmm..segretation in weddings - debatable topic. i guess depends on the guest list!
    how about having the uncles aside - while allowing ur cousins and friends join in the hulla gulla? i rmr on my cuzin’s mehndi there was this moochofied uncle who propped his ass right in front, clearly married with a kid oggling on end during our dances - literally drooling - and we got a few shots of him too on pix and vid! *shudder*
    i believe that its the hulla gulla btn the bros/sis/cuzins/friends that brings out all the fun in a shaadi. we shud also intro merry making at valeemas…with the new couple taking to the dance floor - what fun!
    my friend’s bro’s mehndi was interrupted by rain - and both parties were all out on a dance competition. so it was decided that they have the dances on the baraat. i cudnt make it then coz i ended up with fever frm the cold on the mehndi night..but from the pix, it looked like gr8 fun. i guess it all depends on the family and the company.
    i tell u, even aunties ogle and criticize and snigger more than the uncles.
    phew! sorry for the long comment there!

  13. on 19 Jan 2007 at 3:45 am icedmocha

    @ psyched~ ewww thaz soo grosss

    @ ud~ aargghh segregated is damn annoying. the aunties notice u a hell of a lot more nd then they start imagining couples in their heads..not good!

  14. on 19 Jan 2007 at 11:35 am UTP

    @icedmocha - so you mean to say that in non-segregated functions, they check out the guys also? Heheh…I dont think so…segregated or non-segregated…Aunties are there to check girls….SIMPLE…

  15. on 19 Jan 2007 at 1:07 pm mansoor

    iced: its a sad truth, but aunties do go more to check out girls than for anything else :P

  16. on 19 Jan 2007 at 1:09 pm mansoor

    psyched: i miss the weddings with the dance competitions :P my cousin’s wedding was like that!! enjoyed the hell out of that!

  17. on 21 Jan 2007 at 6:12 am icedmocha

    @ utp~ aunties chek out all sexes..if its non-segregated then thatz just an added bonus 4 them..they can ogle @ the men ahahaha.

    mansoor..i sure hope no aunti-jeez are readin this hehhe

Leave a Reply

Trackback URI | Comments RSS